Analysis Of George Orwells Animal Farm - 1079 Words

Every Animal for Himself â€Å"By striving to do the impossible, man has always achieved what is possible. Those who have cautiously done no more than they believed possible have never taken a single step forward.† -Mikhail Bakunin. This quote sums up what the author of the book Animal Farm was trying to convey. Animal Farm is an allegory of the Russian Revolution. Each character in the book portrays someone who played a part in the revolution. In the book, the author, George Orwell, proves that change cannot happen if no one takes initiative and stands up for what they believe in. Throughout this novel, the animals gradually form their own republican society without humans enslaving them. But when the pigs obtain power they manipulate the†¦show more content†¦Jones. The manor had now become â€Å"Animal Farm†. Because the pigs took initiative, the animals became free from human control. This proves the point that George Orwell was trying to convey, with the help of someone taking ch arge and being proactive, things can change for the better. The pigs decided that it would be a good idea to set up laws for the animals to follow so that Animal Farm would be structured. They came up with the seven commandments, â€Å"1. Whatever goes upon two legs is an enemy. 2. Whatever goes upon four legs, or has wings, is a friend. 3. No animal shall wear clothes. 4. No animal shall sleep in a bed. 5. No animal shall drink alcohol. 6. No animal shall kill any other animal. 7. All animals are equal† (16). The pigs inscribed these commandments on the wall to ensure that the animals never forgot their morals. This part of the book also proves the point that without the pigs’ gumption, the animals wouldn’t know what to do with themselves after the rebellion. All the animals trusted the pigs. They followed everything the pigs said because they felt that the pigs were only trying to do what was best for all the animals. Although the pigs were trying to create equality for all the animals on Animal Farm, they were treati ng themselves as a higher class. Soon after, Snowball and Napoleon got into a disagreement and Snowball was banished forever. Napoleon gained all the power and the animals,Show MoreRelatedAnalysis Of George Orwells Animal Farm701 Words   |  3 Pageswith what he was told. George Orwell’s Animal Farm is about Manor Farm that is seized by its maltreated animals that set up their own government in the now renamed â€Å"Animal Farm†. There are many animals on this farm, including Benjamin, a donkey who is quite old, Clover, a horse who is not very bright, and the two main leaders, pigs named Napoleon and Snowball. Napoleon and Snowball create this new government with seven commandments, the last commandant being that â€Å"All animals are equal†. But when NapoleonRead MoreAnalysis Of George Orwells Animal Farm921 Words   |  4 Pagesover topics such as life or government. When George Orwell wrote his book Animal Farm, it sparked lots of controversy over government. The book was written as a sati re to mock the communist regime that was installed after the Russian Revolution. The book does not directly say it is about the revolution but is almost the same tale. George Orwell used subtle ways such as symbolism and anthropomorphism to represent history in a different way. In Animal Farm, just about every aspect could be used to representRead MoreAnalysis Of George Orwells Animal Farm1711 Words   |  7 Pages1A. Mr. Jones is a significant character because his actions and bad deeds provoked the animal rebellion, similarly to how Tsar Nicholas II ignorance led his abdication, ending the Romanov rule and replacing it with the new Bolshevik government (Krieger 185). Moreover, in the story, the animals replaced what used to be â€Å"Manor Farm† to â€Å"Animal Farm†, and Orwell does this to resemble the transformation of Russia’s government. There are other events in the story that parallel the true events that resembleRead MoreAnalysis Of George Orwells Animal Farm756 Words   |  4 Pages No animal in England is free. The life of an animal is misery and slavery: that is the plain truth. These are the words of George Orwell explaining the imprisonment of communism in his allegory Animal Farm. He tells the story of differences between presentation and actuality in his book. Orwell shows the importance of how people will not rebel if there is an illusion of freedom. In the book, the pigs, who were the leaders of the farm, gives an illusion of freedom by gradually changingRead MoreAnalysis Of George Orwells Animal Farm1142 Words   |  5 Pagesâ€Å"Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it,† said Spanish philosopher George Santayana. This brilliant message shows to be present in George Orwell’s satirical novel Animal Farm. In this book, Orwell uses farm animals to illustrate the true nature of the communist Soviet Union under Joseph Stalin. There are many examples in this book and in real life that show the truth of aforementioned Santayana’s statement, for if one does not remember the past, they are only allowing it toRead MoreCharacter Analysis Of George Orwells Animal Farm748 Words   |  3 PagesFight me! Animals have grown to understand humans and be like humans, until they learn to fight back, and keep the idea that they’re free, and then slowly morph back into the ways it used to be when humans were in charge. Analogies about animal farm can range from, the students connecting the book to the bible, government today, passed wars, or even more, because this book was different for everyone. Animal farm is a very simple book at first, but once a person starts to talk about it, itRead MoreCharacter Analysis Of George Orwells Animal Farm923 Words   |  4 PagesAnimal Farm Character Analysis Essay â€Å"Old major†¦ was so highly regarded on the farm that everyone was quite ready to lose an hour’s sleep in order to hear what he had to say† (Orwell 1). The author, George Orwell, portrayed Old Major as the wisest of all the animals on the farm, and without being said, Major was a big part of Animal Farm. In fact, he influenced the lives of all the animals with just one speech. On the day of this speech, Major taught all the animals his wise ideas in a kind supportingRead MoreHow Is Marxism Portrayed in Animal Farm by George Orwell? Essay1369 Words   |  6 PagesHow is Marxism portrayed throughout ‘Animal Farm’ by George Orwell? The main aim of Marxism is to bring about a classless society, and ‘Animal Farm’ is generally considered to be a Marxist novel, as all its characters share a similar ambition at the beginning. ‘Animal Farm’ represents an example of the oppressed masses rising up to form their own classless society, whilst offering a subtle critique on Stalin’s Soviet Russia, and communism in general. Orwell is, ironically, revolutionary in hisRead MoreAnalysis Of George Orwell And Animal Farm Essay2095 Words   |  9 PagesSharon Pittman HUM 314 13 December 2016 George Orwell and Animal Farm: The Provocative Written Word in Political Protest INTRODUCTION AND THESIS Many writers, artists, novelists, journalists, and the sort seek to bring awareness to political and cultural issues through their work. It is not often, though, that their work attains such critically acclaimed status and subsequently creates a platform by which people are moved to respond to the writing’s purpose. George Orwell, however, had a knack for thisRead MoreHow Has George Orwell Used Animal Farm to Present His View of Human Nature?789 Words   |  4 PagesGeorge Orwell’s Animal Farm is a satirical allegory through which he presents his cynical view of human nature. He uses the animal fable effectively to expose the issues of injustice, exploitation and inequality in human society. Orwell uses the allegory, Animal Farm, to present the story of The Russian Revolution and essentially express his opinions on the matter. By plainly exposing the unjust and corrupt system that is communism, Orwell is ultimately presenting his pessimistic view of human

Biography Of Edward John Mostyn Bowlby - 1690 Words

Edward John Mostyn Bowlby was born in February on the 26th in the year of 1907. Bowlby was one of six children all raised in a middle class family in London. He was the fourth of his six siblings, all children were raised by the family nanny. Bowlby only spend an hour a day with his mother and this was at tea time. During the summer Bowlby and his siblings got to see their mother more often as she was more available. His father was Sir Antony Bowlby he was the surgeon to the Kings household. (www.goodtherapy.org 2007) At the age of seven Bowlby was sent to boarding school. This was very common in upper-class families in this area. Bowlby in fact married at the age of 21 in 1938 to a woman called Ursula Longstaff, they had six children. (www.newworldencyclopedia.org 2013) Bowlby’s primary caregiver from birth was indeed his nanny she departed the family when he was four years old, he developed a secure attachment to his nanny and this caused him the feel deep loss when she left. Bowlby began to grieve this loss and began to believe that separation from the family at such a young age had further consistencies in later life. This is where his theory of attachment first began. (youtube www.madadamfilm.co.uk 2015) Bowlby started his career as a psychologist at Trinity College. After excelling academically within Trinity College Bowlby furthered his career by attending the University college Hospital and studied medicine in London. In World War II Bowlby was a

On Ethics and Economics Book Review Free Essays

On Ethics and Economics Amartya Sen Blackwell Publishers, 1987, pp. 148, Rs. 271 ‘On Ethics and Economics’ by Amartya Sen centres on a particular phenomenon that the author considers unfortunate to the discipline. We will write a custom essay sample on On Ethics and Economics Book Review or any similar topic only for you Order Now In this book, Amartya Sen talks about the continued and ever increasing distancing of economics from ethics. This book has three chapters and under each chapter, there are sub topics. That makes the book more structured and easy to understand even for a person who is not so competent in the study of Economics. Though the book was written in 1987, most of the arguments still apply in todays’ world. Amartya Sen starts off with an Edward Clerihaw Bentley verse about a major practitioner of political economics and this sets the tone for the rest of the book. The author basically tries to argue that ethics-related tradition of Economics dates back to the days of Aristotle and that Economics ultimately goes hand in hand with the study of Ethics and Politics. Amartya Sen certainly and in a very obvious manner, questions the disassociation of the study of Economics from that of ethics and political philosophy. Hence, this book is undoubtedly a very important reading for those who are interested in connecting the dots between economics and business ethics. Professor Sen, while agreeing that the ‘engineering’ approach to Economics has been often fruitful, criticises the same ‘engineering approach’ by saying that it has substantially impoverished the modern economics because it has created a distance between economics and ethics. He also goes on to explain that the ‘Positive Economics’ has led to ignoring complex ethical consideration which effect human behaviour. Professor Sen believes that the growing distances between Ethics and Economics has affected the former more. The author is extremely persuasive when he suggests enlarging the role of welfare economics in understanding the basis for policy decisions involving social achievements. Professor Sen truly believes that Economic advancement is going on at full steam without any moderation from the discipline of ‘ethics’ and that the role of ethics has been ignored by all the policy makers and modern economists. Hence, it is not surprising that ‘Business Ethics’ is regarded as an oxymoron in the business world. The author tries to relate between economic behaviour and rationality. He agrees with the assumption that ‘Humans think rationally. ’ Though the author says that the rational behaviour might not be the actual behaviour all the time, he also says that this particular assumption is better than assuming the humans think irrationally, which will lead to more mistakes than the assumption currently in use. The amount of space and importance given to the assumption by the author makes the reader think about how rationally an individual or the policy makers think today. It plays a huge role in the study of economics. Professor Sen then goes on to talk about the self -interest and rational behaviour. In the second chapter, Economic Judgement and Moral Philosophy, to bring more sanity into the discussion, Professor Sen has brought in the areas that have been neglected by scholars when dealing with the issues of social achievement. They consist of values, rights and freedom, welfare, self-interest and all those that cannot be reduced to a single denomination called utility. According to welfare’s notion of rationality, it is not unreasonable for a person to put his self-interest ahead and to choose the state which maximises his welfare regardless of the goals of others in the society. Professor Sen introduces something called as ‘Agency Role’ when he talks about the dual nature of a person. I completely agree with Professor Sen when he says that a person thinks like an agency when he recognises and acknowledges goals of other people in the society and that a person thinks in terms of a well-being, which too calls for his/her own attention. This can be applied to the Game Theory and the example of Prisoners Dilemma. The arguments put forth by Sen by promoting ethics to economics are very useful to current economic scenarios faced by the global community. For instance, the problem of pollution cannot be solved by providing incentives, but by developing a mind-set that is largely away from self-centredness. If one is unfamiliar with the problem of ethics other than utilitarian standard of analysis, then reading and comprehending this book could be a struggle or might find it difficult to read this book. Perhaps the terms ‘wants’ and ‘needs’ ought to be differentiated so that the choice of individuals will be dictated by ‘needs’ rather than ‘wants’. If this perspective can be used to moderate on the usefulness of utilitarianism or welfarism, and is incorporated within the matrix of the discipline, then there is hope that ethics and economics can contribute to a balanced approach to solving problems of human existence, which is very much the need of the hour right now. -Book review by K Ravi Teja Reddy How to cite On Ethics and Economics Book Review, Essay examples

Principles of Australian Constitutional Law †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Principles of Australian Constitutional Law. Answer: Introduction: The question brings forward the question that is evidently linked with whether the cost that is sustained at the time of locating the machine to a new site shall be beheld as the admissible deductions under section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997. Section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997 Taxation Ruling of TD 93/126 British Insulated Helsby Cables Taking into the considerations that is defined under the 8-1 of the ITAA 1997 the amount of cost involved in moving the assets from one spot to alternative spot would be considered, as capital in nature and no kind of permissible deductions shall be measured as acceptable under the above stated section (Coleman and Sadiq 2013). The expenditure might however result in an increase in the cost of the asset for the purpose of depreciation (Barkoczy et al. 2016). Any kind of cost that is sustained from the minor changes at the site would establish the cost as the deductible disbursement under section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997. This is because they form the part of the business expenditure resulting from the day to day activities of carrying on of a business (Harris et al. 2016). In respect of the decision that is passed under the case of British Insulated Helsby Cables the cost that is incurred at the time of transportation will be accounted in the form of lasting benefit on the commercial properties of the taxpayers by locating the depreciable asset (Kenny 2013). Once the plant is installed and it is in an operational state, the cost involved in brining the machinery in the full operation, however not the cost of additions or modifications would constitute revenue in nature under Taxation Ruling of TD 93/126. From the above defined analysis in the present circumstances it is discerned that the cost involved in shifting the machine to new site characterises a cost that holds the anture capital and it will measured as non- permissible deductions. As it has been defined from the above conduced analysis it can be concluded that moving of fixed asset from one location to another location would be held possessing the characteristics of capital expenditure and no deductions shall be allowed in section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997. The expenditure might however result in a rise in the cost of the item for the purpose of depreciation. The existent question introduces the issues that is related with the revaluation of assets to the effect of insurance cover, which would be measured as acceptable deductions under section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997. As evident from the scenario, though the expenditure is associated with the fixed assets, in determining the deductibility it is important whether the expenditure incurred on revaluing the assets represents the expense that is incurred in enlarging the income producing capacity or they are incurred simply to safeguard or preserve the asset. If the latter results in the form of benefit that is very much expected to possess the characteristics of provisional, exclusively if the spending are in most of the scenario is periodic then it is going to be measured as the deductible spending under section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997 (Keyzer, Goff and Fisher 2015). From the analysis it is discerned that the cost sustained on revaluing the asset to the effect of insurance cover in most likely scenario will be treated as the acceptable deductions from the time when the expenditure is perhaps is possessing the characteristics of frequent and periodic under section 8-1. On arriving at the conclusion, it can be ascertained that the cost incurred represents as an allowable deductions since the expenditure are recurring in nature and satisfies the criteria of deductibility under section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997. The existent question is evidently related to the ascertainment of whether or not the lawful spending incurred by the firm for the purpose of differing an appeal for winding up would be measured as the acceptable deductions under section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997 (Krever 2013). FC of T v Snowden and Wilson Pty Ltd(1958) Taxation ruling of ID 2004/367 Section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997 As defined under the taxation ruling of ID 2004/367 legal cost are generally considered as deductible given the fact that they are incurred or the claim is made because of very act of executing the work through which the taxpayers derives the taxable income. In agreement with the section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997 cost that a taxpayer sustains in the process of winding up of a commercial business are commonly not arisen for the determination of carrying of an occupation and therefore they are not viewed as allowable deduction (Morgan, Mortimer and Pinto 2013). Considering the decision that has been passed in the instance of FC of T v Snowden and Wilson Pty Ltd(1958) the element that the outflow are sustained are infrequent and the taxpayer has in kind of earlier instances was required to commence such legalised activities that in no circumstances avert the disbursement from being regarded as the admissible deductions. From the above stated discussion, it can be discerned that the legal charge sustained in the process of differing a winding up plea would in no circumstances will be acceptable as deductible outflow for the reason that they possess the character of are capital and such outlays falls inside the process of the trade. On arriving at the conclusion, in compliance with section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997 it can be concluded that the cost of opposing a petition for winding up would be considered as non-allowable deductions. The existent question is related with the ascertainment of whether or not the legal disbursement sustained for the amenities of a solicitor for the administration business procedures shall be measured as the acceptable deductions under section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997 (Lang 2014). In respect of the principles that is defined under the section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997, whenever an individual taxpayer concerning the operation of the business to generate the assessable income incurs a legal spending, it will mostly be measured as the acceptable deductions. Nonetheless, there is definite exception whenever the legal spending is sustained signifies the characterises of capital, domestic or private or if it is explicitly sustained in acquiring the exempted and non-taxable non-exempt returns (Nethercott et al. 2016). In this regard, for individual occurring legal fees, the expenditure would not be considered as allowable deductions unless it is clearly incurred in deriving the assessable income. Consequently as it has been noticed from the present scenario it can is discerned that the legal outflow of expenditure sustained by the tax payer signifies a relationship with the trade in acquiring the chargeable proceeds and it would be beheld as admissible deductions in confo rmity with the section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997. In conformity with above stated analysis and section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997 it can be evidently discerned that legal fee that is sustained in the process of the trade to yield the taxable proceeds will measured as the admissible deductions. With regard to the GSTR Act 1999 the existing matter deals with the issue of input tax credit that can be claimed for the expense that is incurred in advertisement. GSTR Act 1999 GSTR 2006/3 Ronpibon Tin NL v. FC of T As it has be clearly made evident in the GST ruling of GSTR 2006/3, the ruling introduces introduces the way on the methods that implemented to figure out the input tax credits. It also defines the method of adjustment to be used by the suppliers of the saleable provisions that is made under the new system of assessment defined under the GST Act 1999. The ruling considers the extent to which the creditable purpose and definite use of the ruling under the division 11, 15 and 129 of the GST Act 1999 (Woellner 2013). The current case study of Big Bank Ltd evidently lay down that fact the company acquired a spending of $1,650,000, which additionally included the amount of GST that is incurred by the company on the advertising campaign in the past year. Taking into the account the evidence of Big Bank Ltd the GST ruling of GSTR 2006/3 is relevant to the units that are registered or compulsory required to attain for registration. It is discerned from the present issue of Big Bank Ltd that it makes the business supplies, which outdoes the fiscal attainment verge; it will be measured at the unit that is authorised for claiming the input tax credits or lowered input tax credits. If an organization is registered or it is required to be registered under the GST Act 1999, GST shall be payable by the individual or the company on the taxable supplies that it makes (Woellner et al. 2016). As stated under the scheme of the GST legislation an individual shall be permitted to input tax credits for the sum of GST that is included in the value of the things an individual acquires or importation for their enterprise (Nethercott et al. 2016). However, if an individual making supplies exceed the threshold limits of the financial acquisition, they will be not be allowed to recover the entire amount of GST charged to them, hence a fragment of the GST shall be able to be recuperated. In respect of the reference to the case of Ronpibon Tin NL v. FC of T the principles of extent and to the extent applies in the understanding of the GST regulation. This comprises of the obligation where the allotment method is accepted in order to be rational and judicious under the situations of the respective enterprise (Morgan, Mortimer and Pinto 2013). Bearing in mind the provisions that has been specified under paragraphs 11-5 and 15-5 for an acquisition to be treated as the creditable realisation or creditable import it ought to be in such a manner that the acquirement is exclusively or somewhat partially for the creditable purpose. Considering the guidelines defined under the subsection 15-25 an import will be somewhat partly be treated as the creditable acquisition if the same is solitarily for a partially creditable purpose. Taking account of the guidelines defined under the section 11-15 or 15-10 an import is partly measured as creditable if an entity makes financial supplies for the purpose of the input tax credit or partly for the domestic purpose (Coleman and Sadiq 2013). As evident in the present Scenario of Big Bank Ltd, the advertising expenditure was incurred for the creditable acquisition purpose. Big Bank Ltd in agreement with the GSTR ruling of 2006/3 it has discerned that the company made the procurement of the fiscal purchases that surpasses the monetary procurement verge and the bill that is issued to the company by their tax consultant will considered eligible for input tax credit or reduced tax credit (Schenk 2016). In compliance with the GST legislation, Big Bank is entitled to input tax cred it for the purpose of GST in the price of advertising expenses acquired or imported by the company. Conclusion: From the analysis that is conducted above, it can be detected that Big Bank Ltd will be qualifies for claiming input tax credit in conformity with GSTR 2006/13 for the expenditure that is incurred on the advertising for the creditable acquisition. Reference List: Barkoczy, S., Nethercott, L., Devos, K. and Richardson, G. (2016).Foundations Student Tax Pack 3 2016. South Melbourne: Oxford University Press Australia New Zealand. Coleman, C. and Sadiq, K. (n.d.).Principles of taxation law 2013. Harris, J., Graw, S., Gilders, F., Kenny, P. and Van der Waarden, N. (n.d.).Theory and law in the regulation of business. Kenny, P. (2013).Australian tax 2013. Chatswood, N.S.W.: LexisNexis Butterworths. Keyzer, P., Goff, C. and Fisher, A. (n.d.).Principles of Australian constitutional law. Chatswood: LexisNexis Butterworths. Krever, R. (2013).Australian taxation law cases 2013. Pyrmont, N.S.W.: Thomson Reuters. Krever, R. (n.d.).Australian taxation law cases 2015. Mangioni, V. (n.d.).Land tax in Australia. Morgan, A., Mortimer, C. and Pinto, D. (2013).A practical introduction to Australian taxation law. North Ryde [N.S.W.]: CCH Australia. Nethercott, L., Devos, K., Gonzaga, L. and Richardson, G. (2016).Australian taxation study manual. Melbourne: Oxford University Press. Woellner, R. (2013).Australian taxation law 2012. North Ryde [N.S.W.]: CCH Australia. Woellner, R., Barkoczy, S., Murphy, S., Evans, C. and Pinto, D. (n.d.).Australian taxation law 2014.